Editorial mirrorBrand mentions redacted to public IDs. Hover to inspect. Everything else is theatre.How it works
THE ENABLERS REGISTRYRegistrar accountability archive
Archive LiveRead-only public record · No ads · No tracking
Cracked crypto wallet with classified breach data and surveillance feed overlay.
Domain dossier / preserved indicators

Redacted domain dossier, minus the house style

We are far too editorially nervous to tell you whether the upstream publisher is correct. We can, however, preserve the dossier, keep the indicators readable, and route every external exit through the source gate.

Domain fileIndicators preservedSource gate wrapped
File /domain/d1-rzyvYzeuoT62/·Source voice preserved·Brand labels redacted
⚠️
This domain has been flagged as malicious
Flagged by THE ENABLERS REGISTRY threat intelligence based on forensic analysis. Exercise extreme caution — do not enter personal information or connect wallets. Generate an official AI-powered complaint letter to file with cybercrime authorities.
Ref
59B44A33
Score
63/100
Engine
PD-4 Turbo
Analysis of [REDACTED] shows a newly registered domain created on March 31, 2026 and hosted behind IANA #1910 protection. The domain resolves to IP 91.206.71.124, which is geolocated to the Netherlands and associated with Walker Web Development Services. DNS is served by cody.ns.IANA #1910.com and jamie.ns.IANA #1910.com. An SSL certificate issued by Google Trust Services (WE1) is present, and the site returns HTTP 200 responses. The only visible page element is the title "Вы не робот?"; no further content has been captured, leaving the exact possibly phishing payload undetermined. Infrastructure indicators include a single appearance on a security blocklist and a blocklisting by THE ENABLERS REGISTRY, while Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 out of 100, reflecting high suspicion. VirusTotal reports that 94 scanners examined the domain without generating detections, but the absence of alerts does not confirm legitimacy. Given the generic possibly phishing classification, the recent registration, low trust score, and active status, defenders should treat [REDACTED] as hostile, enforce URL filtering, monitor related traffic, and consider adding the domain to deny lists until a thorough content analysis can verify the threat level.
VirusTotal
VirusTotal
0 det.
DNS Security
2/12
URLScan
URLScan
Gridinsoft
0/100
SSL
Google Trust Services
Age
4 mo
Observed status
Active threat 200
THE ENABLERS REGISTRY
DestroyList
Listed
Data coverage VirusTotal no detections URLQuery no detections OTX no pulses CF Radar clean URLScan report ready DNS blocks 2/12 SSL valid, 77d WHOIS 4 mo old Screenshot not captured Redirect chain not probed Gridinsoft 0/100
Network Security Intelligence Registrar Integrity Alert
DNS Provider Blocks 2 / 12
Adguard Default Adguard Family
High-Risk Registrar IANA #3765
THE ENABLERS REGISTRY audit found that over 90% of domains registered through IANA #3765 are associated with illegal content. This registrar systematically ignores abuse reports and its primary clientele consists of CIS-region scam operators. We have not identified a single legitimate project hosted on this registrar.

Threat Response Pipeline

Discovery
Checks
Reports
Availability
11/12
Pre-emptive Discovery & Ingestion
Threat Ingested
1/1 ✓
Threat Ingested
[REDACTED] detected and queued for full analysis
Apr 01, 2026
Threat Intelligence Checks
IANA #1910 Radar · Web Archive · VirusTotal · Google Safe Browsing · DNS Security Blocks · High-Risk Registrar: IANA #3765 · Forensic Evidence Collected · Technical Analysis Recorded
8/8 ✓
IANA #1910 Radar
Scanned via IANA #1910 Radar — DNS, certificates & network data
Web Archive
Preserved in Wayback Machine — historical evidence archived
VirusTotal
94 vendors checked on VirusTotal — no vendor detections recorded at check time
Apr 01, 2026
Google Safe Browsing
Apr 01, 2026
DNS Security Blocks
Blocked by 2 of 12 DNS providers: Adguard default, Adguard family
High-Risk Registrar: IANA #3765
90%+ illegal content — registrar ignores abuse reports. Read our verdict
Forensic Evidence Collected
Stored evidence from URLScan.io, URLQuery, stored screenshot
Technical Analysis Recorded
The report contains stored technology or forensic-analysis results
Jul 23, 2026
Notification Records
Abuse Reports Sent
1/1 ✓
Abuse Reports Sent
Abuse report sent to registrar [REDACTED], hosting provider
Apr 01, 2026
Publication & Availability
DestroyList Published · Monitoring Continues
1/2
DestroyList Published
Apr 01, 2026
Monitoring Continues
The domain remains reachable or access-restricted; future checks may update this observation

Public Blocklist Status

Evidence Capture

Live Snapshot
2026-04-01 00:25 UTC
Malicious
Forensic screenshot of [REDACTED] showing the phishing page layout
IP: 91.206.71.124
[REDACTED]
113d old
Google Trust Services
Page Title
Вы не робот?

Domain Intelligence

Domain[REDACTED]
IP Address 91.206.71.124 NL
GeoNL Amsterdam, NL
NetworkAS13335 · Walker Web Development Services
RegistrationCreated Mar 31, 2026 (113d)
Elapsed Since First Report 22 days
What we count Raw elapsed time since the first stored abuse report. It is not a registrar response-time measurement. Latest observed status: Active threat.
What each report contains Stored outgoing report records may reference evidence available at the time, such as vendor verdicts, registration data, hosting details, classifications, or screenshots. This page does not infer the exact payload delivered, receipt, acknowledgement, or action by a recipient.
HTTP Status200
Technical detailsDNS, SSL SANs, timestamps
First DetectedApr 01, 2026
Nameservers["cody.ns.IANA #1910.com","jamie.ns.IANA #1910.com"]
TLS Fingerprint9c7cde6aa8dba18c32a0a44dd88dd432570fb4d8…
Technologies · 1 identified

Web infrastructure and security company providing CDN, DDoS mitigation, and DNS services.

www.IANA #1910.com
Detected via IANA #1910 Radar · Wappalyzer engine
Report This Domain Submit evidence & help protect others

Archived Evidence

Wayback Machine Snapshot
A historical snapshot is available for evidence review
View Archive
Site Performance Analysis

Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of [REDACTED] · checked Apr 1, 2026

100
Good
Performance
FCP
0.75s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
0.75s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0.015
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
0ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
0.75s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good 50-89 Needs Work 0-49 Poor

Evidence & External Reports

Were You Affected by This Site?

You are not alone and there is nothing to be ashamed of. Scammers are sophisticated criminals who exploit trust. Reporting your experience is the most powerful weapon against fraud — your report can prevent others from becoming victims and help law enforcement take action. Silence is the scammer's greatest advantage. Break it.

If you have interacted with this domain, entered personal information, or connected a cryptocurrency wallet — take immediate action. Below are resources to help you report the incident and protect yourself.

Beware of recovery scammers! After being scammed, criminals may contact you again pretending to be "recovery agents," lawyers, or investigators who claim they can retrieve your lost funds — for a fee. This is a second scam. No legitimate service will ask for upfront payment to recover stolen crypto. Learn more about recovery fraud →

Report to Your Local Authorities

Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or generate an AI-powered complaint →

Select your country...
180+ countries
Zero-PII — your data never leaves the browser AI writes in your language

Related Domain Reports

dumbo.to
dumbo.to
14 detections · Similar title
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
12 detections · Similar title
chemservice.to
chemservice.to
11 detections · Similar title
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
10 detections · Similar title
bk.edgecapitaltrust.co
bk.edgecapitaltrust.co
7 detections
fgrdfgk.xdwwq.club
fgrdfgk.xdwwq.club
4 detections
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
5 detections
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
5 detections

More Domains at IANA #3765 6 flagged

[REDACTED] favicon [REDACTED] 3/95 [REDACTED] favicon [REDACTED] 2/95 [REDACTED] favicon [REDACTED] [REDACTED] favicon [REDACTED] 2/95 [REDACTED] favicon [REDACTED] 17/95 [REDACTED] favicon [REDACTED]

About This Report: [REDACTED]

This report presents the latest stored evidence available to THE ENABLERS REGISTRY. Source timestamps are shown where available; availability and vendor verdicts can change after collection.

The site displays a page titled “Вы не робот?”.

[REDACTED] has been listed on THE ENABLERS REGISTRY as a suspicious domain. Scanned by 94 security vendors — automated detections may take time to update. THE ENABLERS REGISTRY threat analysts continue to monitor this domain.

If you believe this listing is inaccurate, you can submit an appeal. For more information about our methodology, visit our FAQ page.

Stay Informed, Stay Safe

Monitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive

Live Threat Feed Appeal This Listing

Recommendations & Advice for Victims

An estimated $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 (source). If you interacted with [REDACTED] — act now.

What should I do immediately?
Urgent
  • Revoke token approvals — use revoke.cash to remove access granted to malicious smart contracts
  • Move remaining funds to a brand-new wallet. The compromised wallet is no longer safe
  • Change all passwords — email, exchange accounts, anything that shares the same password
  • Enable 2FA using an authenticator app (not SMS). Disable SMS-based recovery
  • Freeze cards if you entered banking details on the possibly phishing site
What information should I collect for my report?
FBI guidelines

According to the FBI, the most important details are transaction data:

  • Cryptocurrency addresses — scammer's wallet (e.g., 0x5856...35985)
  • Amount & crypto type — exact amount (e.g., 1.02345 ETH, 0.5 BTC, 500 USDT)
  • Transaction ID (hash) — the unique blockchain transaction identifier
  • Exact dates & times — of each transaction and first contact with scammer
  • Screenshots — scam website, chat messages, emails, wallet transactions, social media
  • All URLs & domains used by the scammer (including [REDACTED])
  • Communications — emails, texts, phone numbers, usernames the scammer used

Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.

Where should I report the scam?

The FBI recovered over $1 billion in crypto fraud in 2024 thanks to victim reports. Your report matters.

How do crypto scams typically work?
  • Fake websites — pixel-perfect clones of legitimate sites with slightly altered domains
  • Malicious approvals — "connect wallet" prompts that grant unlimited token spending to attackers
  • Pig butchering — trust built over weeks via [REDACTED]/WhatsApp/dating apps, then money stolen
  • Recovery scams — victims targeted AGAIN by fake "recovery agents" demanding upfront fees. Always a scam
  • Fake ads & airdrops — Google/social media ads and "free token" offers leading to wallet drainers
  • AI-powered scams — deepfakes, automated possibly phishing, and AI-generated sites making fraud harder to detect
How can I protect myself in the future?
  • Use a hardware wallet ([REDACTED], [REDACTED]). Never store large amounts in browser wallets
  • Bookmark official sites — never click links from emails, DMs, or ads
  • Read every approval — verify permissions before signing. Reject unlimited approvals
  • Verify domains — check on THE ENABLERS REGISTRY before interacting. Check HTTPS, spelling, domain age
  • "Too good to be true" = scam — guaranteed returns, celebrity endorsements, urgent deadlines
How big is the crypto scam problem?
  • $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 — CoinLedger
  • Pig butchering losses grew 40% year over year, now the fastest-growing fraud type
  • Only ~5% of victims report — your report helps shut down criminal networks
  • FBI recovered $1B+ in 2024 thanks to victim reports — FBI.gov

Sources: FBI · CoinLedger · WorldMetrics

Archive note

If the page below still says “we” or sounds suspiciously confident, that remains the upstream publisher speaking. TER only preserves the record, strips the house branding, and keeps exits wrapped through the source gate.