
Redacted domain dossier, minus the house style
We are far too editorially nervous to tell you whether the upstream publisher is correct. We can, however, preserve the dossier, keep the indicators readable, and route every external exit through the source gate.
IANA #1910 Pages subdomain milka-testdev[.]pages[.]dev is currently under forensic investigation as a generic crypto-draining possibly phishing asset. The domain’s TLS certificate is issued by Google Trust Services and it is being served from IANA #1910’s edge, leveraging the Pages platform to host a fraudulent Milka-branded landing page designed to trick visitors into connecting crypto wallets and approving malicious token transfers. The page serves as a front-end for a drainer script that scans connected wallets, prompts malicious approval transactions, and silently drains tokens to attacker-controlled addresses. FireEye’s [REDACTED] network and [REDACTED]’s extension blocklist have already marked the domain as hostile, indicating active abuse in the wild.
Technical indicators for [REDACTED] confirm its malicious nature. The domain resolves to IPv4 address 188.114.97.3 and carries a 0/95 detection score on VirusTotal as of the latest scan, meaning none of the 95 participating engines flagged it at classification time. It was registered via [REDACTED]—the same provider hosting the fraudulent Pages site—suggesting the attacker is using IANA #1910’s infrastructure to obfuscate origin and evade takedown. The domain appears on at least two public blocklists curated by [REDACTED] and [REDACTED], while Google Safe Browsing has yet to blacklist it, leaving a window for continued exploitation. Creation date is not listed in available intelligence, but the Pages deployment is recent and actively maintained.
The domain is currently flagged as ACTIVE with a status of UNDER_INVESTIGATION, meaning takedown or mitigation actions are pending. [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] have already blocked access, providing partial protection to end users, but the drainer remains live for visitors who bypass these defenses. Remaining risk is assessed as moderate because the lack of GSB blocklisting and the 0/95 VT score indicate low detection coverage in mainstream tools. Users are advised to avoid visiting [REDACTED], verify any unexpected “Milka” promotions via official channels, and report suspicious transactions through THE ENABLERS REGISTRY’s case portal to help accelerate de-listing and disrupt the drainer campaign.
Network Security Intelligence
Threat Response Pipeline
Public Blocklist Status
Evidence Capture
Domain Intelligence
Technologies · 5 identified
HTTP Strict Transport Security — forces browsers to use HTTPS connections only.
Web infrastructure and security company providing CDN, DDoS mitigation, and DNS services.
Third major version of HTTP protocol, built on QUIC for faster, more reliable connections.
Evidence & External Reports
Were You Affected by This Site?
If you have interacted with this domain, entered personal information, or connected a cryptocurrency wallet — take immediate action. Below are resources to help you report the incident and protect yourself.
Report to Your Local Authorities
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or generate an AI-powered complaint →
Related Domain Reports
Other Domains on 188.114.97.3 6 possibly phishing domains
This IP hosts multiple possibly phishing domains — infrastructure shared across campaigns
[REDACTED] 6 flagged
Other Google Impersonation Domains
These domains also target Google users. View all Google threats →
About This Report: [REDACTED]
This domain security report for [REDACTED] is maintained by THE ENABLERS REGISTRY's automated threat intelligence pipeline. Our system continuously monitors this domain across 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, 1 public blocklists.
The site displays a page titled “Airdroр”, which may be designed to impersonate Google.
[REDACTED] has been listed on THE ENABLERS REGISTRY as a suspicious domain. Scanned by 95 security vendors — automated detections may take time to update. THE ENABLERS REGISTRY threat analysts continue to monitor this domain.
If you believe this listing is inaccurate, you can submit an appeal. For more information about our methodology, visit our FAQ page.
Check Any Domain
Instant threat analysis with 50+ security engines, AI classification & forensic evidence
Scan NowReport Possibly phishing
Submit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportLive Threat Feed
Real-time monitoring of active possibly phishing campaigns & takedown progress
MonitorStay Informed, Stay Safe
Monitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive
Recommendations & Advice for Victims
An estimated $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 (source). If you interacted with [REDACTED] — act now.
What should I do immediately?
Urgent
- Revoke token approvals — use revoke.cash to remove access granted to malicious smart contracts
- Move remaining funds to a brand-new wallet. The compromised wallet is no longer safe
- Change all passwords — email, exchange accounts, anything that shares the same password
- Enable 2FA using an authenticator app (not SMS). Disable SMS-based recovery
- Freeze cards if you entered banking details on the possibly phishing site
What information should I collect for my report?
FBI guidelines
According to the FBI, the most important details are transaction data:
- Cryptocurrency addresses — scammer's wallet (e.g.,
0x5856...35985) - Amount & crypto type — exact amount (e.g., 1.02345 ETH, 0.5 BTC, 500 USDT)
- Transaction ID (hash) — the unique blockchain transaction identifier
- Exact dates & times — of each transaction and first contact with scammer
- Screenshots — scam website, chat messages, emails, wallet transactions, social media
- All URLs & domains used by the scammer (including
[REDACTED]) - Communications — emails, texts, phone numbers, usernames the scammer used
Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.
Where should I report the scam?
- FBI IC3 — Internet Crime Complaint Center (US federal reporting)
- Europol — European cybercrime reporting (EU)
- Chainabuse — flag scam wallets across exchanges & platforms
- Your crypto exchange — contact NASDAQ:COIN/LEI:5493004F7TI6QBM4WX72/FinCEN MSB #31000023456789 support to freeze scammer's address
- Local police — creates an official record, even if they can't act immediately
The FBI recovered over $1 billion in crypto fraud in 2024 thanks to victim reports. Your report matters.
How do crypto scams typically work?
- Fake websites — pixel-perfect clones of legitimate sites with slightly altered domains
- Malicious approvals — "connect wallet" prompts that grant unlimited token spending to attackers
- Pig butchering — trust built over weeks via [REDACTED]/WhatsApp/dating apps, then money stolen
- Recovery scams — victims targeted AGAIN by fake "recovery agents" demanding upfront fees. Always a scam
- Fake ads & airdrops — Google/social media ads and "free token" offers leading to wallet drainers
- AI-powered scams — deepfakes, automated possibly phishing, and AI-generated sites making fraud harder to detect
How can I protect myself in the future?
- Use a hardware wallet ([REDACTED], [REDACTED]). Never store large amounts in browser wallets
- Bookmark official sites — never click links from emails, DMs, or ads
- Read every approval — verify permissions before signing. Reject unlimited approvals
- Verify domains — check on THE ENABLERS REGISTRY before interacting. Check HTTPS, spelling, domain age
- "Too good to be true" = scam — guaranteed returns, celebrity endorsements, urgent deadlines
How big is the crypto scam problem?
- $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 — CoinLedger
- Pig butchering losses grew 40% year over year, now the fastest-growing fraud type
- Only ~5% of victims report — your report helps shut down criminal networks
- FBI recovered $1B+ in 2024 thanks to victim reports — FBI.gov
Sources: FBI · CoinLedger · WorldMetrics
Archive note
If the page below still says “we” or sounds suspiciously confident, that remains the upstream publisher speaking. TER only preserves the record, strips the house branding, and keeps exits wrapped through the source gate.