Redacted domain dossier, minus the house style
We are far too editorially nervous to tell you whether the upstream publisher is correct. We can, however, preserve the dossier, keep the indicators readable, and route every external exit through the source gate.
THE ENABLERS REGISTRY identifies a live PayPal possibly phishing domain hosted on [REDACTED] that mimics the legitimate Zapier subdomain to harvest user credentials and financial data. The campaign employs a generic possibly phishing kit designed to impersonate PayPal’s support portal, tricking victims into entering sensitive information under the guise of account verification or transaction review. The domain leverages the trusted [REDACTED] namespace to bypass email security filters and social engineering defenses, increasing the likelihood of successful compromise. This domain resolves to IP address 64.239.123.65 and is secured with a Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate, which may falsely reassure users. According to VirusTotal analysis conducted on seed 4ff81c, only 2 out of 95 participating security vendors flagged the domain as malicious, indicating low initial detection across major threat intelligence platforms. The domain uses a free or low-cost registrar and was observed during active campaigning, with no evidence of takedown as of current monitoring cycles. Google Safe Browsing (GSB) has not yet listed the domain, and the blocklist count remains minimal, highlighting the stealthy nature of this threat. The possibly phishing page remains active and is actively redirecting victims, posing an elevated risk to individuals and organizations with PayPal accounts. Immediate response actions include DNS blocking, browser-based blacklisting, and engagement with Zapier to investigate and suspend the malicious subdomain. While detection remains low, the domain’s active status and use of a legitimate hosting provider ([REDACTED]) complicate mitigation. Users are strongly advised to verify URLs manually, enable multi-factor authentication, and report suspicious communications to PayPal and relevant cybersecurity authorities. Remaining risk is elevated due to ongoing activity and limited early-stage detection.
Network Security Intelligence
Threat Response Pipeline
Public Blocklist Status
![[REDACTED]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11744586?s=200&v=4){kind=small}
Evidence Capture
![Forensic screenshot of [REDACTED] showing the phishing page layout](https://enablers.report/019da1bf-2121-76dc-a07b-65db2784f582.png)
[REDACTED]Domain Intelligence
[REDACTED] 
(SE) · Abuse: abuse@vercel.com
Walnut, US · [REDACTED] · [REDACTED]Technologies · 6 identified
Cloud computing platform offering compute, storage, and networking services.
Cloud platform for frontend deployment, optimized for Next.js.
HTTP Strict Transport Security — forces browsers to use HTTPS connections only.
VirusTotal Analysis
Site Performance Analysis
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of [REDACTED] · checked Apr 18, 2026
Site Configuration Analysis
Evidence & External Reports
URLScan
Were You Affected by This Site?
If you have interacted with this domain, entered personal information, or connected a cryptocurrency wallet — take immediate action. Below are resources to help you report the incident and protect yourself.
Report to Your Local Authorities
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or generate an AI-powered complaint →
Related Domain Reports
Other Domains on 64.239.123.65 6 possibly phishing domains
This IP hosts multiple possibly phishing domains — infrastructure shared across campaigns
[REDACTED] 6 flagged
Other [REDACTED] Impersonation Domains
These domains also target [REDACTED] users. View all [REDACTED] threats →
About This Report: [REDACTED]
This domain security report for [REDACTED] is maintained by THE ENABLERS REGISTRY's automated threat intelligence pipeline. Our system continuously monitors this domain across 4 security vendors on VirusTotal, 1 public blocklists.
The site displays a page titled “Getting Started | [REDACTED] Wallet”, which may be designed to impersonate [REDACTED].
[REDACTED] has been flagged by 4 security vendors as of June 8, 2026.
If you believe this listing is inaccurate, you can submit an appeal. For more information about our methodology, visit our FAQ page.
Check Any Domain
Instant threat analysis with 50+ security engines, AI classification & forensic evidence
Scan NowReport Possibly phishing
Submit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportLive Threat Feed
Real-time monitoring of active possibly phishing campaigns & takedown progress
MonitorStay Informed, Stay Safe
Monitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive
Recommendations & Advice for Victims
An estimated $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 (source). If you interacted with [REDACTED] — act now.
What should I do immediately?
Urgent
- Revoke token approvals — use revoke.cash to remove access granted to malicious smart contracts
- Move remaining funds to a brand-new wallet. The compromised wallet is no longer safe
- Change all passwords — email, exchange accounts, anything that shares the same password
- Enable 2FA using an authenticator app (not SMS). Disable SMS-based recovery
- Freeze cards if you entered banking details on the possibly phishing site
What information should I collect for my report?
FBI guidelines
According to the FBI, the most important details are transaction data:
- Cryptocurrency addresses — scammer's wallet (e.g.,
0x5856...35985) - Amount & crypto type — exact amount (e.g., 1.02345 ETH, 0.5 BTC, 500 USDT)
- Transaction ID (hash) — the unique blockchain transaction identifier
- Exact dates & times — of each transaction and first contact with scammer
- Screenshots — scam website, chat messages, emails, wallet transactions, social media
- All URLs & domains used by the scammer (including
[REDACTED]) - Communications — emails, texts, phone numbers, usernames the scammer used
Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.
Where should I report the scam?
- FBI IC3 — Internet Crime Complaint Center (US federal reporting)
- Europol — European cybercrime reporting (EU)
- Chainabuse — flag scam wallets across exchanges & platforms
- Your crypto exchange — contact NASDAQ:COIN/LEI:5493004F7TI6QBM4WX72/FinCEN MSB #31000023456789 support to freeze scammer's address
- Local police — creates an official record, even if they can't act immediately
The FBI recovered over $1 billion in crypto fraud in 2024 thanks to victim reports. Your report matters.
How do crypto scams typically work?
- Fake websites — pixel-perfect clones of legitimate sites with slightly altered domains
- Malicious approvals — "connect wallet" prompts that grant unlimited token spending to attackers
- Pig butchering — trust built over weeks via [REDACTED]/WhatsApp/dating apps, then money stolen
- Recovery scams — victims targeted AGAIN by fake "recovery agents" demanding upfront fees. Always a scam
- Fake ads & airdrops — Google/social media ads and "free token" offers leading to wallet drainers
- AI-powered scams — deepfakes, automated possibly phishing, and AI-generated sites making fraud harder to detect
How can I protect myself in the future?
- Use a hardware wallet ([REDACTED], [REDACTED]). Never store large amounts in browser wallets
- Bookmark official sites — never click links from emails, DMs, or ads
- Read every approval — verify permissions before signing. Reject unlimited approvals
- Verify domains — check on THE ENABLERS REGISTRY before interacting. Check HTTPS, spelling, domain age
- "Too good to be true" = scam — guaranteed returns, celebrity endorsements, urgent deadlines
How big is the crypto scam problem?
- $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 — CoinLedger
- Pig butchering losses grew 40% year over year, now the fastest-growing fraud type
- Only ~5% of victims report — your report helps shut down criminal networks
- FBI recovered $1B+ in 2024 thanks to victim reports — FBI.gov
Sources: FBI · CoinLedger · WorldMetrics
Archive note
If the page below still says “we” or sounds suspiciously confident, that remains the upstream publisher speaking. TER only preserves the record, strips the house branding, and keeps exits wrapped through the source gate.