Redacted domain dossier, minus the house style
We are far too editorially nervous to tell you whether the upstream publisher is correct. We can, however, preserve the dossier, keep the indicators readable, and route every external exit through the source gate.
THE ENABLERS REGISTRY identifies [REDACTED] as an active crypto drainer possibly phishing domain designed to trick cryptocurrency holders into connecting their wallets to a fraudulent service. The domain mimics legitimate platforms through a Weebly-hosted page, leveraging a compromised or spoofed interface to prompt wallet connections and initiate unauthorized crypto transfers. Security analysts observed this domain resolving to IP 74.115.51.55 and confirmed active redirection to a wallet-draining interface, with threat actors likely distributing the link via social engineering campaigns targeting crypto users. This domain was flagged by THE ENABLERS REGISTRY after security vendor analysis revealed 7 out of 95 security engines on VirusTotal detected malicious activity, placing it at high risk. [REDACTED], a corporate registrar known for handling legitimate domains, but the registration date of December 19, 2012 suggests potential domain hijacking or prior compromise. Despite its age, this domain has recently been repurposed for malicious use, as confirmed by real-time monitoring showing sustained activity. The combination of deceptive hosting (Weebly), a fraudulent SSL certificate from Google Trust Services, and low detection rates among security vendors makes this domain particularly dangerous for unsuspecting users. If you visited [REDACTED], immediately disconnect your cryptocurrency wallet and revoke any permissions granted. Run a full system scan using reputable antivirus software and consider using a dedicated wallet for transactions. Report the domain to THE ENABLERS REGISTRY and your browser’s security team to help block further access. Avoid interacting with any prompts for wallet connections or login credentials on this domain. Users should also monitor their transactions for unusual activity and consider transferring remaining funds to a secure, newly generated wallet address if theft is suspected. Proactive verification of domains before wallet connections is strongly advised to prevent financial loss.
Network Security Intelligence
Threat Response Pipeline
Public Blocklist Status
![[REDACTED]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/11744586?s=200&v=4){kind=small}
Evidence Capture
![Forensic screenshot of [REDACTED] showing the phishing page layout](https://enablers.report/019da5a3-6c12-7511-8ac9-c12677e9fb8f.png)
[REDACTED]Domain Intelligence
[REDACTED] · Abuse: abusecomplaints@IANA #292.com, whoisrequest@IANA #292.com
Oakland, US · [REDACTED] · [REDACTED]Technologies · 5 identified
Open-source relational database management system.
Server-side scripting language designed for web development.
Progressive JavaScript framework for building user interfaces.
Web infrastructure and security company providing CDN, DDoS mitigation, and DNS services.
VirusTotal Analysis
Archived Evidence
Site Performance Analysis
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of [REDACTED] · checked Apr 19, 2026
Evidence & External Reports
URLScan
Were You Affected by This Site?
If you have interacted with this domain, entered personal information, or connected a cryptocurrency wallet — take immediate action. Below are resources to help you report the incident and protect yourself.
Report to Your Local Authorities
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or generate an AI-powered complaint →
Related Domain Reports
Other Domains on 74.115.51.55 6 possibly phishing domains
This IP hosts multiple possibly phishing domains — infrastructure shared across campaigns
[REDACTED] 6 flagged
About This Report: [REDACTED]
This domain security report for [REDACTED] is maintained by THE ENABLERS REGISTRY's automated threat intelligence pipeline. Our system continuously monitors this domain across 20 security vendors on VirusTotal, 1 public blocklists.
The site displays a page titled “Home | .”.
[REDACTED] has been flagged by 20 security vendors as of June 8, 2026.
If you believe this listing is inaccurate, you can submit an appeal. For more information about our methodology, visit our FAQ page.
Check Any Domain
Instant threat analysis with 50+ security engines, AI classification & forensic evidence
Scan NowReport Possibly phishing
Submit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportLive Threat Feed
Real-time monitoring of active possibly phishing campaigns & takedown progress
MonitorStay Informed, Stay Safe
Monitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive
Recommendations & Advice for Victims
An estimated $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 (source). If you interacted with [REDACTED] — act now.
What should I do immediately?
Urgent
- Revoke token approvals — use revoke.cash to remove access granted to malicious smart contracts
- Move remaining funds to a brand-new wallet. The compromised wallet is no longer safe
- Change all passwords — email, exchange accounts, anything that shares the same password
- Enable 2FA using an authenticator app (not SMS). Disable SMS-based recovery
- Freeze cards if you entered banking details on the possibly phishing site
What information should I collect for my report?
FBI guidelines
According to the FBI, the most important details are transaction data:
- Cryptocurrency addresses — scammer's wallet (e.g.,
0x5856...35985) - Amount & crypto type — exact amount (e.g., 1.02345 ETH, 0.5 BTC, 500 USDT)
- Transaction ID (hash) — the unique blockchain transaction identifier
- Exact dates & times — of each transaction and first contact with scammer
- Screenshots — scam website, chat messages, emails, wallet transactions, social media
- All URLs & domains used by the scammer (including
[REDACTED]) - Communications — emails, texts, phone numbers, usernames the scammer used
Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.
Where should I report the scam?
- FBI IC3 — Internet Crime Complaint Center (US federal reporting)
- Europol — European cybercrime reporting (EU)
- Chainabuse — flag scam wallets across exchanges & platforms
- Your crypto exchange — contact NASDAQ:COIN/LEI:5493004F7TI6QBM4WX72/FinCEN MSB #31000023456789 support to freeze scammer's address
- Local police — creates an official record, even if they can't act immediately
The FBI recovered over $1 billion in crypto fraud in 2024 thanks to victim reports. Your report matters.
How do crypto scams typically work?
- Fake websites — pixel-perfect clones of legitimate sites with slightly altered domains
- Malicious approvals — "connect wallet" prompts that grant unlimited token spending to attackers
- Pig butchering — trust built over weeks via [REDACTED]/WhatsApp/dating apps, then money stolen
- Recovery scams — victims targeted AGAIN by fake "recovery agents" demanding upfront fees. Always a scam
- Fake ads & airdrops — Google/social media ads and "free token" offers leading to wallet drainers
- AI-powered scams — deepfakes, automated possibly phishing, and AI-generated sites making fraud harder to detect
How can I protect myself in the future?
- Use a hardware wallet ([REDACTED], [REDACTED]). Never store large amounts in browser wallets
- Bookmark official sites — never click links from emails, DMs, or ads
- Read every approval — verify permissions before signing. Reject unlimited approvals
- Verify domains — check on THE ENABLERS REGISTRY before interacting. Check HTTPS, spelling, domain age
- "Too good to be true" = scam — guaranteed returns, celebrity endorsements, urgent deadlines
How big is the crypto scam problem?
- $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 — CoinLedger
- Pig butchering losses grew 40% year over year, now the fastest-growing fraud type
- Only ~5% of victims report — your report helps shut down criminal networks
- FBI recovered $1B+ in 2024 thanks to victim reports — FBI.gov
Sources: FBI · CoinLedger · WorldMetrics
Archive note
If the page below still says “we” or sounds suspiciously confident, that remains the upstream publisher speaking. TER only preserves the record, strips the house branding, and keeps exits wrapped through the source gate.