Redacted domain dossier, minus the house style
We are far too editorially nervous to tell you whether the upstream publisher is correct. We can, however, preserve the dossier, keep the indicators readable, and route every external exit through the source gate.
Why this matters — ICANN RAA §3.18 obligation & victim-assistance
On THE ENABLERS REGISTRY delivered an evidence-backed abuse report
(repeated 4 times, most recently ) to abuse@globaldomaingroup.com with VirusTotal detections, urlscan capture, legal violations, and full screenshot evidence.
More than 33 hours later, the possibly phishing infrastructure remains reachable
.
Under ICANN RAA §3.18 accredited registrars are contractually obliged to “take reasonable and prompt steps to investigate and respond appropriately to any reports of abuse.” Silence beyond 24 hours after a documented notification with verifiable evidence is not a timing issue — it is a policy decision to let the operation continue. THE ENABLERS REGISTRY\'s position: where a registrar fails to act on clear evidence, the registrar has aligned itself with the operator of the scheme and bears co-responsibility for downstream harm caused to victims from the moment of notification onward.
Victim-assistance obligation. [REDACTED] doesn't consider the listed detections enough proof — that is interesting in itself, given the volume of independent vendor confirmations. But after 4 separate notifications over 33 hours, with the operation still active, the registrar took no measurable action to mitigate the harm caused by their client. The reasonable next step is direct help to any identified victims — contact & payment-trail disclosure, abuse-thread transcripts, registrant data preservation — since the registrar chose, by inaction, to extend the window of damage.
A VirusTotal scan involving 91 antivirus and URL‑reputation engines returned no detections, but the absence of alerts does not constitute evidence of benign behavior, especially given the active blocklist entry and recent creation date. No public information is available regarding SSL certificate details, HTTP response codes, Safe Browsing status, or page title, so those vectors remain unverified. The limited age of the domain (only two days old at the time of reporting) coupled with its rapid appearance on a blocklist is consistent with a credential‑possibly phishing campaign that leverages newly registered domains to evade early detection.
Defenders should continue to block traffic to the domain, monitor for any connections to the associated IP address, and update intrusion‑prevention signatures to include the observed hostnames. Incident response teams should also consider investigating any credential submissions that may have been directed to this domain and enforce multi‑factor authentication to mitigate potential credential compromise.
Threat Response Pipeline
Public Blocklist Status
Evidence Capture
Domain Intelligence
(US)
Technical detailsDNS, SSL SANs, timestamps
Related Campaign Members · 8 sharing fingerprint
Technologies · 3 identified
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
[REDACTED] 100% confidenceHTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
[REDACTED] 100% confidenceSite Performance Analysis
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of appsecureguard1829.cfd · checked Jul 25, 2026
Evidence & External Reports
URLScan
Were You Affected by This Site?
If you have interacted with this domain, entered personal information, or connected a cryptocurrency wallet — take immediate action. Below are resources to help you report the incident and protect yourself.
Report to Your Local Authorities
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or generate an AI-powered complaint →
Related Domain Reports
More Domains at Global Domain Group 6 flagged
Other Google Impersonation Domains
These domains also target Google users. View all Google threats →
About This Report: appsecureguard1829.cfd
This report presents the latest stored evidence available to THE ENABLERS REGISTRY. Source timestamps are shown where available; availability and vendor verdicts can change after collection.
The site displays a page titled “Google”, which may be designed to impersonate Google.
appsecureguard1829.cfd has been listed on THE ENABLERS REGISTRY as a suspicious domain. Scanned by 91 security vendors — automated detections may take time to update. THE ENABLERS REGISTRY threat analysts continue to monitor this domain.
If you believe this listing is inaccurate, you can submit an appeal. For more information about our methodology, visit our FAQ page.
Check Any Domain
Threat analysis using stored blocklist, WHOIS, DNS, and public scan evidence
Scan NowReport Possibly phishing
Submit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportLive Threat Feed
Recent possibly phishing reports and observed availability changes
MonitorStay Informed, Stay Safe
Monitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive
Recommendations & Advice for Victims
An estimated $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 (source). If you interacted with appsecureguard1829.cfd — act now.
What should I do immediately?
Urgent
- Revoke token approvals — use revoke.cash to remove access granted to malicious smart contracts
- Move remaining funds to a brand-new wallet. The compromised wallet is no longer safe
- Change all passwords — email, exchange accounts, anything that shares the same password
- Enable 2FA using an authenticator app (not SMS). Disable SMS-based recovery
- Freeze cards if you entered banking details on the possibly phishing site
What information should I collect for my report?
FBI guidelines
According to the FBI, the most important details are transaction data:
- Cryptocurrency addresses — scammer's wallet (e.g.,
0x5856...35985) - Amount & crypto type — exact amount (e.g., 1.02345 ETH, 0.5 BTC, 500 USDT)
- Transaction ID (hash) — the unique blockchain transaction identifier
- Exact dates & times — of each transaction and first contact with scammer
- Screenshots — scam website, chat messages, emails, wallet transactions, social media
- All URLs & domains used by the scammer (including
appsecureguard1829.cfd) - Communications — emails, texts, phone numbers, usernames the scammer used
Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.
Where should I report the scam?
- FBI IC3 — Internet Crime Complaint Center (US federal reporting)
- Europol — European cybercrime reporting (EU)
- Chainabuse — flag scam wallets across exchanges & platforms
- Your crypto exchange — contact NASDAQ:COIN/LEI:5493004F7TI6QBM4WX72/FinCEN MSB #31000023456789 support to freeze scammer's address
- Local police — creates an official record, even if they can't act immediately
The FBI recovered over $1 billion in crypto fraud in 2024 thanks to victim reports. Your report matters.
How do crypto scams typically work?
- Fake websites — pixel-perfect clones of legitimate sites with slightly altered domains
- Malicious approvals — "connect wallet" prompts that grant unlimited token spending to attackers
- Pig butchering — trust built over weeks via [REDACTED]/WhatsApp/dating apps, then money stolen
- Recovery scams — victims targeted AGAIN by fake "recovery agents" demanding upfront fees. Always a scam
- Fake ads & airdrops — Google/social media ads and "free token" offers leading to wallet drainers
- AI-powered scams — deepfakes, automated possibly phishing, and AI-generated sites making fraud harder to detect
How can I protect myself in the future?
- Use a hardware wallet ([REDACTED], [REDACTED]). Never store large amounts in browser wallets
- Bookmark official sites — never click links from emails, DMs, or ads
- Read every approval — verify permissions before signing. Reject unlimited approvals
- Verify domains — check on THE ENABLERS REGISTRY before interacting. Check HTTPS, spelling, domain age
- "Too good to be true" = scam — guaranteed returns, celebrity endorsements, urgent deadlines
How big is the crypto scam problem?
- $51 billion flowed to illicit crypto wallets in 2024 — CoinLedger
- Pig butchering losses grew 40% year over year, now the fastest-growing fraud type
- Only ~5% of victims report — your report helps shut down criminal networks
- FBI recovered $1B+ in 2024 thanks to victim reports — FBI.gov
Sources: FBI · CoinLedger · WorldMetrics
Archive note
If the page below still says “we” or sounds suspiciously confident, that remains the upstream publisher speaking. TER only preserves the record, strips the house branding, and keeps exits wrapped through the source gate.